“Only data can protect us now”
As a conveyancer, especially at this time of year, you’ll
know it’s not really the season of good tidings and joy. Pressure levels are at a level that would
make a Tower executive wince, with social media posts reveals a depressing
litany of long working hours where everything feels like a battle.
What makes this even more challenging are these issues are
coming from a multitude of sources; clients, lenders, agents and indeed other
lawyers.
History tells us that fighting a battle on multiple fronts typically
ends in defeat and we must take steps to avoid this - data has a vital role to
play in protecting ourselves.
1.
Speed to information
We must give lawyers the tools to do the job and reduce the
time wasted on the simple things, such as finding case details. It sounds obvious, but without fast and ready
access to case details, lawyers are on the backfoot when someone calls in asking
for an update. This inefficiency
increases stress and the reliance on the individual with knowledge of the case.
Case management systems should be configured to offer
extensive search facilities such as case reference, client surname, property
address, postcode, other side law firm, estate agent or even mortgage reference
number. While this might result in
invalid results being returned, this is resolved by a secondary narrower search
within the initial results.
Once a case is found, it’s important to show as much information
as possible to the user, rather than burying it in sub-menus and pop-ups. Identify what is important to someone who
doesn’t know anything about the case and show it. For example, the name of the fee earner,
their assistant, the status of searches or the number of outstanding enquiries.
If a case management system does not support the building of
such summary screens, Excel can be used instead – the benefits of having a
single place to look outweigh the overheads of maintaining this data.
2.
Make dates your friend
Anyone involved in property transactions will complain about
the length of time involved and the lack of transparency. The process IS inefficient but by not having
accurate information about timings to hand, lawyers leave themselves open to
accusations of causing delays.
These accusations can be stressful for lawyers to deal with,
which is why we must track timings – given lawyers the necessary information to
hand, builds confidence and reduces feelings of being unfairly attacked.
For example, clients often over-estimate timings and complain
that their case has been “dragging on for months”. They frequently use the offer acceptance date
as a starting point and don’t factor in that it took them three weeks to return
their paperwork. On a purchase, a
contract pack may not have been received for six weeks and replies to enquiries
delayed by a month. Unless lawyers have this
information to hand, in an easy to read format such as weeks, they are an easy
target.
Again, for those case management systems that don’t support this,
it can be easily achieved in Excel by storing the dates and calculating the
difference between them. datedif()should
be a conveyancer’s Excel function of choice.
3.
Identify specifics
Finally, one of most egregious myths about conveyancing is
that it’s “just a tick-box exercise” whose simplicity makes the length of time
it takes for a deal to go through even more frustrating. The reality is, of course, very different,
with each case being annoyingly unique.
The lists of differences can be extensive; lender requirements,
clients getting divorced, buy-to-let transactions or undertakings required, for
example. However, by storing all these in
a single place, (we call it our “Hazard Grid”) reduces the dependency and
pressure on the individual lawyer by sharing this with colleagues and helps
pre-empt issues during the case.
Such “hazard grids” do not need to be complicated enabling
the user to click to turn on the hazard warning and clicking to turn it off
again. Again, this can be achieved very
easily with Excel using conditional formatting to highlight a cell based on its
value.
Is this really necessary?
Whilst some retain the view that clients are looking for a
professional legal opinion, the harsh reality is that the demands on lawyers have
never been higher and will only continue to grow. Expectations of Amazon-style immediacy are
only going to increase and the delivery of service now extends beyond legal expertise.
Lawyers must accept that service now includes delivering timely
information, which realistically can only achieved with further investment in technology-based
information systems.
Unless they take steps to exploit the support that
technology provides, lawyers will continue to experience the negativity and
aggression that is part of society today.
Even at Christmas.
Peter Ambrose is the CEO of The Partnership and Legalito – specialists
in the delivery of transparent and ultra-efficient conveyancing software and services.
Peter Ambrose: pambrose@thepartnershiplimited.com,
01483 579978
Press enquiries: Tracy Holland, tholland@thepartnershiplimited.com
01483 579978